• What You Measure is What You Get.

    Einstein : Not everything that can be counted counts. And not everything that counts can be counted.
  • About me.

    I know enough to know that at 04.00am it gets dark out on the streets. It has done this for the last twenty odd years, to my knowledge and will probably continue for the forseeable future. At some stage in this ‘future’ I shall retire and probably won’t give a damn if it still gets dark at 04.00am. Until then I shall be out there, somewhere, lurking in the shadows because someone, somewhere will be doing stuff they shouldn’t and then, well then I will introduce myself. In the meanwhile I shall try to remain sane and remember why I joined in the first place and try to ignore all the people who piss me off by making the job more complicated than it should be.
  • Opinions

    Any opinions contained in posts are mine and mine alone. Many of them will not be those of any Police Force, Police Organisation or Police Service around this country. The opinions are based on many years of working within the field of practical operational Police work and reflect the desire to do things with the minimum of interference by way of duplication for the benefit of others who themselves do not do the same job. I recognise that we all perform a wide range of roles and this is essential to make the system work. If you don’t like what you see remember you are only one click on the mouse away from leaving. I accept no responsibility for the comments left by others.
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Brett Anderson on Another 90 minutes
    Another 90 minutes |… on T.W.I.M.C.
    Another 90 minutes |… on 90 Minutes
    whichendbites on Try saying……..inst…
    Diem Burden on Try saying……..inst…
  • C.T.C. Constabulary.

    A Strategic Community Diversity Partnership. We are cutting bureaucracy and reducing the recording of target and monitoring related statistics. Our senior leaders will drive small, economical cars from our fleet surplus to save money to invest in better equipment for our frontline response officers. We are investing money to reinstate station canteens for the benefits of those 24/7 response officers. We have a pursuit policy. The message is that if you commit an offence and use a vehicle, we will follow you and stop you if necessary. It is your duty to stop when the lights and sirens are on. We take account of the findings of the Force questionnaire and are reducing the administration and management levels and returning these officers to frontline response duties. We insist on a work-life balance. We have no political masters. We are implimenting selection processes that take account of an individuals skills and proven abilities for the job. Our senior leaders will have one foot in reality and still possess the operational Policing skills they have long forgotton about and seldom used. All ranks are Police Officers first and specialists second. We will impliment career development and performance evaluation monitoring of our leaders by those officers who operate under that leadership. The most important role is that of Constable. All other roles are there to positively support the role and the responsibility of Constable and the duties performed.
  • Whichendbites

    “We trained very hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising. It can be a wonderful method of creating the illusion of progress while creating confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation.”......Petronius
  • Just so.

    Taxation is just a sophisticated way of demanding money with menaces.
  • Reality.

    Only in our dreams are we free. The rest of the time we need wages.
  • Rank V’s Responsibility

    Don't confuse your idea of how important you are with the responsibility of your role.
  • Meetings.

    If you had to identify, in one word, why we will never achieve our full potential, Meetings would be that word.
  • There is always a bigger picture.

    When there is no answer to your problem, there is always deflection from the need to justify giving an answer.
  • Advertisements


I have got this from the blog of 200weeks, it sums up a lot of people’s feelings about scum. I have posted about scum on a previous occasion.

This is the face of Nicholase Hague.


Hague’s handiwork can be see in the photograph below.


You might need some assistance to work out that the battered face is that of a 60-year-old female, Susan Collins, after Hague kicked her to the ground and repeatedly stamped on her face when she declined to give him a cigarette in Warrington. The victim is still in a wheelchair, is blind in one eye and 4 metal plates were used to reconstruct her face.

Susan was put on a life support machine as a result of this pond-life’s actions.

Hague had received an 18-month jail term in 2005 after admitting helping another man kick a 31-year-old man to death in Warrington in 2004.

Excuse me, did I read that right? This man got 18 months for helping to kick to death another person? 18 months? Is someone having a laugh?

How many times do stories have to appear like this before someone in the judicial system will sit up and take note and dish out some proper sentences. If this man had been given anything like the kind of sentence most reasonable people would expect for assisting in a murder, he wouldn’t have been on the streets to do almost the same thing to an innocent 60-year old woman.

As if the original sentence wasn’t joke enough, as a result of this unprovoked attack on a woman, the judge jailed him indefinitely for GBH recommending he serve at least 3 1/2 years!

I think it’s about time people started sueing judges and defence solicitors for actions which ultimately allow scum like Hague to go out and do it again.

Tough on crime……………………. ?



Protecting the Public.

Protecting the public is something that covers a wide area. Part of this includes whether or not someone is granted bail prior to being dealt with at court. A lot of you will know that the application process seems to fall directly in favour of the suspect. A pretty good reason or reasons have to be given to incarcerate someone whilst they are awaiting trial. 

How many of you have seen your suspect fail to turn up when they are duly ordered to by the legal process, not once but sometimes more, and appear to treat the system with contempt on many occasions. Hence the system of opposing bail is regularly asked for but often refused or comes with conditions that are regularly ignored.

There has been some serious discussion over the right of suspects to be granted bail recently. There was the  case of Met inspector Garry Weddell, 47, who was accused of strangling his wife and trying to make it look like suicide.  He was freed by Judge John Bevan and later shot dead his mother-in-law,  before later killing himself.  Judge Bevan cannot, apparently, recall why he granted bail. Weddell had remained in custody until September when he was freed on conditional bail by Judge Bevan in a hearing at Ipswich crown court.  At the hearing, Weddell’s brother Geoffrey, a barrister, offered surety of £200,000 and persuaded the judge that the officer was not likely to commit any further crime, abscond or interfere with witnesses. This proved not to be the case. An inquiry is underway to find out exactly why, despite CPS objections, Weddell was granted bail. 

The bail issue has been further highlighted  following reports that there is a 300% rise in the number of suspects being granted bail in an effort to relieve the pressure on already overcrowded prisons. But as a result of the prison overcrowding crisis, Judges and Magistrates have been urged by the Government to release them.

Adam Swellings was freed on bail for a charge assault and was one of a group who kicked  to death father-of-three Garry Newlove.

Could it possibly be that there are only bail granting policies and no outside influences on the system and no financial implications in the decision making processes that concern bail and the efforts to protect the…………………………………….protect the…………………protect the public.  This decision is made on each individual case on the individual merits and is the decision of the Magistrates or Judge overseeing the individual case. The reasons appear to be subject to other influences and the Police or CPS cannot decide who is suitable for bail and who is not. I suspect that there are some people out there who might disagree with this, not least the families of some of the real victims.

That’s it, to protect the public, that’s right.  Protect the public. That’s what a refusal to grant bail is for, to protect the public.  After all, this is one of the reasons why a refusal to grant bail is asked for, because there are serious reasons why bail should not be granted. To protect the public, amongst other serious reasons. I’ve said it enough so you should be convinced.

Tough on Crime………………. ?   People in custody on remand will be claiming compensation for something next.