• What You Measure is What You Get.

    Einstein : Not everything that can be counted counts. And not everything that counts can be counted.
  • About me.

    I know enough to know that at 04.00am it gets dark out on the streets. It has done this for the last twenty odd years, to my knowledge and will probably continue for the forseeable future. At some stage in this ‘future’ I shall retire and probably won’t give a damn if it still gets dark at 04.00am. Until then I shall be out there, somewhere, lurking in the shadows because someone, somewhere will be doing stuff they shouldn’t and then, well then I will introduce myself. In the meanwhile I shall try to remain sane and remember why I joined in the first place and try to ignore all the people who piss me off by making the job more complicated than it should be.
  • Opinions

    Any opinions contained in posts are mine and mine alone. Many of them will not be those of any Police Force, Police Organisation or Police Service around this country. The opinions are based on many years of working within the field of practical operational Police work and reflect the desire to do things with the minimum of interference by way of duplication for the benefit of others who themselves do not do the same job. I recognise that we all perform a wide range of roles and this is essential to make the system work. If you don’t like what you see remember you are only one click on the mouse away from leaving. I accept no responsibility for the comments left by others.
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    whichendbites on Try saying……..inst…
    Diem Burden on Try saying……..inst…
    Diem Burden on Who am I ?
    Dogman on Section within a section, with…
    annettes blog on Ghost of Christmas past……
  • C.T.C. Constabulary.

    A Strategic Community Diversity Partnership. We are cutting bureaucracy and reducing the recording of target and monitoring related statistics. Our senior leaders will drive small, economical cars from our fleet surplus to save money to invest in better equipment for our frontline response officers. We are investing money to reinstate station canteens for the benefits of those 24/7 response officers. We have a pursuit policy. The message is that if you commit an offence and use a vehicle, we will follow you and stop you if necessary. It is your duty to stop when the lights and sirens are on. We take account of the findings of the Force questionnaire and are reducing the administration and management levels and returning these officers to frontline response duties. We insist on a work-life balance. We have no political masters. We are implimenting selection processes that take account of an individuals skills and proven abilities for the job. Our senior leaders will have one foot in reality and still possess the operational Policing skills they have long forgotton about and seldom used. All ranks are Police Officers first and specialists second. We will impliment career development and performance evaluation monitoring of our leaders by those officers who operate under that leadership. The most important role is that of Constable. All other roles are there to positively support the role and the responsibility of Constable and the duties performed.
  • Whichendbites

    “We trained very hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising. It can be a wonderful method of creating the illusion of progress while creating confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation.”......Petronius
  • Just so.

    Taxation is just a sophisticated way of demanding money with menaces.
  • Reality.

    Only in our dreams are we free. The rest of the time we need wages.
  • Rank V’s Responsibility

    Don't confuse your idea of how important you are with the responsibility of your role.
  • Meetings.

    If you had to identify, in one word, why we will never achieve our full potential, Meetings would be that word.
  • There is always a bigger picture.

    When there is no answer to your problem, there is always deflection from the need to justify giving an answer.

Fiscal prudence.

The Review Body on Senior Salaries (SSRB) recommends the rate at which MPs are paid and sets the level of any increase in their salary in line with those in the Civil Service. The SSRB also suggests the amounts paid in allowances to Members of both Houses. The House of Commons has the final say in accepting the recommendations of the SSRB.

It is reassuring to hear that the House of Commons has the final say in accepting the recommendations and they are not in the hands of someone else, someone else who controls the purse strings. 

You only have to go back a year to December 2006 to see how it was reported that MPs were facing a furious public backlash after demanding their pay should rise to £100,000 a year, that was a 66% increase.  Go back another year to December 2005 and they were after a 22% increase.

Backbenchers had written to the independent body which sets their salary, seeking an eye-watering 66 per cent increase on the current £60,277.  Only a staggering 66%.

They claim the huge hike would simply put them on a par with other senior public sector workers such as GPs and council chiefs.

If the MPs had their way, the annual House of Commons salary bill would soar from £39million to £65million. On top of this, the 646 members last year claimed a total of £86.7million in expenses and office allowances – worth an average £134,000 each.

And the cost of running the House of Commons, including all lighting, heating, maintenance, subsidised food and staffing costs means that each MP already costs taxpayers a total of £726,000 a year.

At the end of the day many of them do not appear to have had a proper job for most of their working (in the loosest sense) lives. Bring back the likes of Martin Bell.

Most work at Westminster for only 31⁄2 days a week and no longer have to stay for regular late-night sittings which were abolished three years ago.

Members can claim salaries for researchers, secretaries and other staff as well as travel on official business, office costs, stationery, postage and computer equipment.

They are allowed to claim for 350 miles of travel every month without submitting receipts apparently.

Nice if you can get a job there.

In March of this year it was reported that MPs had awarded themselves an extra £6.5 million of taxpayers’ money to fund what was condemned as their own ‘shameless self-promotion’.

Every MP will be entitled to claim an extra £10,000 a year in expenses to ‘communicate’ with their constituents.

Gordon Brown, chancellor at the time, was facing the prospect of a wave of strikes after he slammed the brakes on years of bumper pay rises for health workers and other public sector staff. He announced below-inflation pay awards for nurses, doctors, dentists, civil servants and prison officers.

Even more recent in July of this year MPs were accused yesterday of showing ‘contempt’ for taxpayers after it was revealed that they submitted inflation-busting expense claims last year. The total paid out to MPs to cover the cost of travel, pensions, staffing, and general expenses rose from £90.5million in 2005-2006 to £95.5million last year – a rise of 5.5 per cent.

Everyone else has to save money to pay for this it seems. Of course the Government would never santion this as it would not be deemed fiscal prudence.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: