• What You Measure is What You Get.

    Einstein : Not everything that can be counted counts. And not everything that counts can be counted.
  • About me.

    I know enough to know that at 04.00am it gets dark out on the streets. It has done this for the last twenty odd years, to my knowledge and will probably continue for the forseeable future. At some stage in this ‘future’ I shall retire and probably won’t give a damn if it still gets dark at 04.00am. Until then I shall be out there, somewhere, lurking in the shadows because someone, somewhere will be doing stuff they shouldn’t and then, well then I will introduce myself. In the meanwhile I shall try to remain sane and remember why I joined in the first place and try to ignore all the people who piss me off by making the job more complicated than it should be.
  • Opinions

    Any opinions contained in posts are mine and mine alone. Many of them will not be those of any Police Force, Police Organisation or Police Service around this country. The opinions are based on many years of working within the field of practical operational Police work and reflect the desire to do things with the minimum of interference by way of duplication for the benefit of others who themselves do not do the same job. I recognise that we all perform a wide range of roles and this is essential to make the system work. If you don’t like what you see remember you are only one click on the mouse away from leaving. I accept no responsibility for the comments left by others.
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    whichendbites on Try saying……..inst…
    Diem Burden on Try saying……..inst…
    Diem Burden on Who am I ?
    Dogman on Section within a section, with…
    annettes blog on Ghost of Christmas past……
  • C.T.C. Constabulary.

    A Strategic Community Diversity Partnership. We are cutting bureaucracy and reducing the recording of target and monitoring related statistics. Our senior leaders will drive small, economical cars from our fleet surplus to save money to invest in better equipment for our frontline response officers. We are investing money to reinstate station canteens for the benefits of those 24/7 response officers. We have a pursuit policy. The message is that if you commit an offence and use a vehicle, we will follow you and stop you if necessary. It is your duty to stop when the lights and sirens are on. We take account of the findings of the Force questionnaire and are reducing the administration and management levels and returning these officers to frontline response duties. We insist on a work-life balance. We have no political masters. We are implimenting selection processes that take account of an individuals skills and proven abilities for the job. Our senior leaders will have one foot in reality and still possess the operational Policing skills they have long forgotton about and seldom used. All ranks are Police Officers first and specialists second. We will impliment career development and performance evaluation monitoring of our leaders by those officers who operate under that leadership. The most important role is that of Constable. All other roles are there to positively support the role and the responsibility of Constable and the duties performed.
  • Whichendbites

    “We trained very hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising. It can be a wonderful method of creating the illusion of progress while creating confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation.”......Petronius
  • Just so.

    Taxation is just a sophisticated way of demanding money with menaces.
  • Reality.

    Only in our dreams are we free. The rest of the time we need wages.
  • Rank V’s Responsibility

    Don't confuse your idea of how important you are with the responsibility of your role.
  • Meetings.

    If you had to identify, in one word, why we will never achieve our full potential, Meetings would be that word.
  • There is always a bigger picture.

    When there is no answer to your problem, there is always deflection from the need to justify giving an answer.

New Sentencing Policy.

The CTCC has been in consultation with the CPS and Government to discuss a radical new sentencing policy for offences of fraud and deception. Upon conviction the new recommendations concerning sentencing will not justify custodial terms if new guidelines of acceptable mitigation are identified.

Mitigation suggestions will be dealt with and considered on a case by case basis but are likely to include the following circumstances.

1. I have done nothing wrong.

2. I have made an error of judgement.

3. It was within the rules.

4. I am sorry. I will pay it back.

5. I have nothing to hide, I have nothing to fear.

6. This was an oversight, I was very busy at the time.

7. It was the fault of the system.

Could these be a different way of stating the usual ?

1. I haven’t done anything.

2. You can’t prove a thing.

3. No comment.

A new and more radical sentencing policy would be by way of a paper distribution to all registered voters. These voters can then decide by placing their mark, by way of a large X, in the appropriate box to show if the suspect is worthy of selection. The suspect with the least numbers of X’s is deemed to be unworthy and slopes off into obscurity. The suspect with the most X’s will claim to be of pure descent, honest and true and assume the mantle accordingly.

This is hardly the population acting as emperor giving the thumbs down towards the pit of the Colosseum to decide the fate of the chosen one, but as near as makes no difference.

An interesting thought though. Perhaps we should engage with our communities to see what they want. They could ring their local officer to pass on their views about community sentencing.

About these ads

7 Responses

  1. That’s a fine idea. Sounds vaguely familiar…

    WEB for PM.

    You can keep the dog with you and use him/her to scare the pants off any foreign leader who dares to disagree with you.

  2. Well written – I’m glad I’m not alone in seeing the similarity between some of their responses, and a “no comment” interview.

    Thanks for the laugh.

  3. Can we try them in the ‘court of public opinion’? That would sort out the moneygrabbing pocket-liners from the good, honest upstanding MPs.

    Unfortunately, if we lock up all the ones comitting fraud, I doubt we’ll have enough MPs left to form any parties…

  4. Renoir, All plusses so far….I have doubts about our party politics. When they are not busy stealing from the taxpayer, all our ‘leaders’ seem to do is look to their short term future. Winning the next election, at any cost, just promise any old crap for votes. They do not look to the long term care of this country or it’s law abiding citizens.

  5. The first ‘test’ will be the Europe elections in June. The MPs that made the outrageous claims must have thought they would never be found out. – Wrong.
    And there must be a few MPs in so called safe seats who are ‘bricking it’ at the thought of the next General Election

  6. WEB, you have omitted the ever-popular ‘It was an administrative error’ from your list. Next time someone’s in court for driving no insurance I daresay we’ll let them off without penalty as long as they promise that it was a genuine oversight ……. Oh no, I forgot, ignorance is no defence in the eyes of the law is it?

  7. What surprises me about this is that people are surprised that a very large proportion of MPs are greedy, grasping shysters who believe they’re “entitled”.

    You only have to look at the background the typical MP, regardless of part, to see that many of them have never done a real job in their life and have been lining up to take their turn at the top of the gravy train.

    And even among those who have moved on to politics from other things there are quite a few who have succumbed to the “but I’m privileged and I’m entitled” culture.

    I think MPs should be limited to a maximum of 20 years in office, while lawyers should be banned from being MPs at all due to the huge conflict of interest between those making the laws and those interpreting them to the advantage of themselves and their clients. There should also be a ban on married couples both being MPs at the same time.

    As for any of them caught skimming public funds, put them in the stocks for 12 hours a day in every major centre in their constituency.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: