• What You Measure is What You Get.

    Einstein : Not everything that can be counted counts. And not everything that counts can be counted.
  • About me.

    I know enough to know that at 04.00am it gets dark out on the streets. It has done this for the last twenty odd years, to my knowledge and will probably continue for the forseeable future. At some stage in this ‘future’ I shall retire and probably won’t give a damn if it still gets dark at 04.00am. Until then I shall be out there, somewhere, lurking in the shadows because someone, somewhere will be doing stuff they shouldn’t and then, well then I will introduce myself. In the meanwhile I shall try to remain sane and remember why I joined in the first place and try to ignore all the people who piss me off by making the job more complicated than it should be.
  • Opinions

    Any opinions contained in posts are mine and mine alone. Many of them will not be those of any Police Force, Police Organisation or Police Service around this country. The opinions are based on many years of working within the field of practical operational Police work and reflect the desire to do things with the minimum of interference by way of duplication for the benefit of others who themselves do not do the same job. I recognise that we all perform a wide range of roles and this is essential to make the system work. If you don’t like what you see remember you are only one click on the mouse away from leaving. I accept no responsibility for the comments left by others.
  • Recent Comments

    whichendbites on Try saying……..inst…
    Diem Burden on Try saying……..inst…
    Diem Burden on Who am I ?
    Dogman on Section within a section, with…
    annettes blog on Ghost of Christmas past……
  • C.T.C. Constabulary.

    A Strategic Community Diversity Partnership. We are cutting bureaucracy and reducing the recording of target and monitoring related statistics. Our senior leaders will drive small, economical cars from our fleet surplus to save money to invest in better equipment for our frontline response officers. We are investing money to reinstate station canteens for the benefits of those 24/7 response officers. We have a pursuit policy. The message is that if you commit an offence and use a vehicle, we will follow you and stop you if necessary. It is your duty to stop when the lights and sirens are on. We take account of the findings of the Force questionnaire and are reducing the administration and management levels and returning these officers to frontline response duties. We insist on a work-life balance. We have no political masters. We are implimenting selection processes that take account of an individuals skills and proven abilities for the job. Our senior leaders will have one foot in reality and still possess the operational Policing skills they have long forgotton about and seldom used. All ranks are Police Officers first and specialists second. We will impliment career development and performance evaluation monitoring of our leaders by those officers who operate under that leadership. The most important role is that of Constable. All other roles are there to positively support the role and the responsibility of Constable and the duties performed.
  • Whichendbites

    “We trained very hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising. It can be a wonderful method of creating the illusion of progress while creating confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation.”......Petronius
  • Just so.

    Taxation is just a sophisticated way of demanding money with menaces.
  • Reality.

    Only in our dreams are we free. The rest of the time we need wages.
  • Rank V’s Responsibility

    Don't confuse your idea of how important you are with the responsibility of your role.
  • Meetings.

    If you had to identify, in one word, why we will never achieve our full potential, Meetings would be that word.
  • There is always a bigger picture.

    When there is no answer to your problem, there is always deflection from the need to justify giving an answer.

Early release scheme – success ?

As part of the Governments early release scheme to make space in our prisons to allow even more convicted criminals to be incarcerated, therefore protecting the public, the decision was made to release non-violent prisoners before their sentences were complete. Complete in so much that they qualify for release as opposed to completing the length of the sentence, we all know this never happens.

Andrew Mournian was convicted for a violent assault offence and duly received a period of imprisonment. He was released early under the early release scheme.

He then went on to murder the same victim. Yes that’s right. He had a custodial sentence for assault, was released early as part of the scheme and then went  on to murder the same victim.

He was released early for assault on Amanda Murphy and had a history of domestic violence and whilst on early release he murdered her.

Exactly what does the term non-violent prisoner mean ?

Exactly what type of non-violent offence does the early release scheme cover ?

This man, a man with previous for violence, violence towards the victim, was released for an offence of violence against the victim and whilst on early release murders the same victim.

The Judge stated that this may have happened anyway but, and it is a really big but, his early release helped this to happen. He was given a life (14 years) sentence at Leeds Crown Court, to protect the public no doubt.

The Judge denies a link and the politicians fail to accept their responsibilities for providing the opportunity for this to happen.

6 Responses

  1. Inspector Gadget has done the same story.
    Now you cannot blame the government for this mistake, it was whoever decided that he was eligable for release.
    Obviously they had not taken into account his previous record of violence and why they thought he would be o.k. to release him.

    It’s a tragic mistake, but you can only blame the person responsible….not the government.

  2. “Exactly what does the term non-violent prisoner mean ?” Excellent question!

    This guy sure wouldn’t have fit the bill of nonviolent, “before” he was released early. It makes you wonder…do they even look into the acts that landed them behind bars in the first place? No common sense seems to go into some of these decisions. Assault = violent

  3. Do we seriously think that either this bloody government, or the Judges, will accept any blame? Cloud cuckoo land springs to mind.

  4. Aaahhh Annette, we cannot blame the Government ?

    Was it not the Government who decided that the early release scheme would be put in place because the prisons are full to overcrowding and there are still convicted people being given custodial sentences ?

    The Government decided to impliment the scheme and set the rules by which it was done because their policy on prisons and crime is failing.

    People are not jailed upon conviction unless there are reasons that come within the sentencing policies. These also change depending on spaces and political pressures. They assure us that sentencing policy for violent crime is positive and this reflects the protection of the victim and the public.

    This guy is most definately violent. His history and his character are ones of violence. He should not have been released. What he does after may not have been any different but early release for him was a very big mistake andsimply wrong.

    This is yet another example of how our Government think they are never to blame for anything they do that goes wrong. Itis somehow always someone elses fault. Everyone is accountable exept for them.

  5. WEB:
    I totally agree that that man should never have been released. It was a dreadful mistake.
    When the government bought that act in they only meant to release people that were non violent.
    As you know they usually are released early with good behaviour anyway. If they are released early it makes more room for the very dangerous, violent people.
    The governement is not responsible for that man in particular, it was however dealt with that particular case. He/She could not have read up about him and his violent pass.
    I am worried about this overcrowding in prisons problem, the only answer would be to build more prisons.
    But where you would put them I don’t know.

  6. It’s appalling, no two ways about it. I think what got me was the response ‘he’d have killed her anyway whenever he was released’.

    Excuse me?

    In which reality is that acceptable?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: